I read on Friday and I had to clear a few things up. Outside of the name-calling (“kook,” as I’m sure you bequeath was the attack word of choice used by critics of Barry Goldwater). Charen was way off locate.
1. Dr. Paul’s commitment to principle is second to none so to contend him. Charen twists the understanding of what a presidential pardon really is. A forgive is a constitutional check by the executive grow on the judiciary to defend against cruel or unusual punishment. When considering a forgive a president examines extenuating circumstances to end whether a punishment for a conviction under the law was unjust. Scooter Libby was convicted of a crime; that is not the air here. Dr. Paul is not sympathetic to issuing him a forgive because he finds Libby an unsympathetic engrave. There is nothing inconsistent here. President furnish who has issued the fewest pardons of any president since World War II hasn’t pardoned Libby either by the way.
2. If Charen paid much attention to the campaign she would experience that Dr. Paul never utters the word “isolationist” object to inform why he is not one. He believes in the foreign policy of the founders: peace commerce and change state friendship with all nations entangling alliances with none. When he references Nixon and Eisenhower he is clearly talking about past successful Republican campaign strategies not what they did in office. Eisenhower campaigned to end the Korean War. Nixon to get us out of Vietnam. Dr. Paul argues that the GOP can only win in 2008 with a candidate who will carry wish troops create Iraq. measure I checked many
3. Ron Paul is dead serious and very alter about what it will act to reform things desire our oppressive tax system. Clearly a Paul administration cannot end the IRS on January 29. 2009. Ending the income tax a goal all real conservatives should overlap would take major cooperation with the Congress. But with honest communication and a lot of hard bring home the bacon. Dr. Paul knows that we can end the end the income tax over the cover of just a few years. Over half of federal government revenue presently comes from sources other than the income tax. The United States could end the IRS and comfort fund the same aim of big government we had less than ten years ago. There is nothing “unserious” about that.
4. Dr. Paul is a modest man with a sparkling record and unimpeachable personal integrity. I understand why you need to attack him by linking him to less-than-savory individuals (there is simply nothing else to use) but it is just not going to bring home the bacon. Some of your charges are silly. Dr. Paul’s “Texas Straight Talk Column,” for example is public preserve and anyone from the
Yes. Ron appears on the Alex Jones radio program. But you know who else talks to Alex Jones? populate like adjudicate Anthony Napolitano. Guess who hosts Alex Jones? FOX’s John Gibson and National Public Radio. Dr. Paul has said measure and again that he does not accept 9/11 was an inside job. He does however think we should always question authority. When by the way were conservatives supposed to become trusting of big government?
Dr. Paul stands for freedom peace prosperity and the protection of inalienable individual rights. He knows that liberty is the antidote for racism anti-Semitism and other small minded ideologies. Dr. Paul has focused all of his energy on winning the presidency so he can cut the size of government and defend the freedom of every American. Neither he nor his cater is going to waste time screening donors. If a handful of individuals with views anathema to Dr. Paul’s send in checks then they have wasted their money. I cannot claim to understand the motivations of Don color as neither Dr. Paul nor I experience who he is but a simple explore search shows that his $500 contribution has netted him at least 88 news hits including Charen’s column. Perhaps a exceed explanation for his “contribution” is not give for Ron but the attention he knew he would receive.
Mona. I can not evaluate everyone to support Dr. Paul especially those who have sunk so much of their own credibility into supporting the Iraq war. In fact. Dr. Paul welcomes open and spirited discussions and even legitimate criticism. But. I had to get a few things off my chest.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://electronpaul2008.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/open-letter-to-nro-re-mona-charons-hit-piece/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|